Namibia vs Spain: Global aquaculture wild fish feed
Namibia
278.22
in 2015
Spain
509
in 2015
Namibia rank
50th
Spain rank
48th
Global aquaculture wild fish feed over time
- Namibia
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 509 against 278.22 in Namibia, a difference of 230.78.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.8 times Namibia's.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 50th and Spain ranks 48th of 69 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.69 | 31,348 | 31,346 | Spain |
| 1970s | 27.19 | 37,204 | 37,177 | Spain |
| 1980s | 109.51 | 33,355 | 33,246 | Spain |
| 1990s | 405.33 | 29,454 | 29,049 | Spain |
| 2000s | 319.29 | 514.15 | 194.87 | Spain |
| 2010s | 246.69 | 483.08 | 236.39 | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global aquaculture wild fish feed, Namibia or Spain?
- Spain, at 509 against 278.22 in Namibia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in global aquaculture wild fish feed between Namibia and Spain?
- 230.78, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Spain?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2015.
- How do Namibia and Spain rank globally for global aquaculture wild fish feed?
- Namibia ranks 50th and Spain ranks 48th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture wild fish feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.