South Korea vs United Kingdom: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed

South Korea
33,355 tonnes
in 2015
United Kingdom
39,012 tonnes
in 2015
South Korea rank
29th
United Kingdom rank
28th

Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed over time

  • South Korea
  • United Kingdom
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k195019822015

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 39,012 tonnes against 33,355 tonnes in South Korea, a difference of 5,657 tonnes.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.2 times South Korea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was United Kingdom ahead.

South Korea ranks 29th and United Kingdom ranks 28th of 69 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 3 and United Kingdom in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1950s 1,244 tonnes 43,202 tonnes 41,958 tonnes United Kingdom
1960s 6,352 tonnes 62,831 tonnes 56,479 tonnes United Kingdom
1970s 40,271 tonnes 111,133 tonnes 70,862 tonnes United Kingdom
1980s 163,012 tonnes 24,183 tonnes 138,829 tonnes South Korea
1990s 73,046 tonnes 42,573 tonnes 30,472 tonnes South Korea
2000s 36,883 tonnes 60,983 tonnes 24,100 tonnes United Kingdom
2010s 36,600 tonnes 28,317 tonnes 8,283 tonnes South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed, South Korea or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 39,012 tonnes against 33,355 tonnes in South Korea as of 2015.
What is the difference in global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed between South Korea and United Kingdom?
5,657 tonnes, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and United Kingdom?
66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
How do South Korea and United Kingdom rank globally for global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed?
South Korea ranks 29th and United Kingdom ranks 28th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs United Kingdom: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid, drawing on Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/korea-rep/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/korea-rep/united-kingdom/">South Korea vs United Kingdom: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed
Unit
tonnes
Source
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
69 places, 4,524 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed

Some wild fish catch is processed into fishmeal and oils for animal feed – this is used for land-based livestock and fish farms (aquaculture). Efficiency improvements in aquaculture, and changes in the diets of farmed fish means production has increased rapidly, without increasing inputs from wild fish.