Greenland vs Mauritania: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed

Greenland
8,886 tonnes
in 2015
Mauritania
5,798 tonnes
in 2015
Greenland rank
37th
Mauritania rank
39th

Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed over time

  • Greenland
  • Mauritania
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k195019822015

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 8,886 tonnes against 5,798 tonnes in Mauritania, a difference of 3,088 tonnes.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.5 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Mauritania ahead.

Greenland ranks 37th and Mauritania ranks 39th of 69 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1950s 13.1 tonnes 75.15 tonnes 62.05 tonnes Mauritania
1960s 20.58 tonnes 228.17 tonnes 207.58 tonnes Mauritania
1970s 156.61 tonnes 455.93 tonnes 299.32 tonnes Mauritania
1980s 116.74 tonnes 402.74 tonnes 286.01 tonnes Mauritania
1990s 1,339 tonnes 358.21 tonnes 981.28 tonnes Greenland
2000s 3,067 tonnes 1,514 tonnes 1,553 tonnes Greenland
2010s 4,287 tonnes 4,856 tonnes 569.54 tonnes Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed, Greenland or Mauritania?
Greenland, at 8,886 tonnes against 5,798 tonnes in Mauritania as of 2015.
What is the difference in global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed between Greenland and Mauritania?
3,088 tonnes, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Mauritania?
66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
How do Greenland and Mauritania rank globally for global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed?
Greenland ranks 37th and Mauritania ranks 39th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Mauritania: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid, drawing on Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/greenland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/greenland/mauritania/">Greenland vs Mauritania: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed
Unit
tonnes
Source
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
69 places, 4,524 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed

Some wild fish catch is processed into fishmeal and oils for animal feed – this is used for land-based livestock and fish farms (aquaculture). Efficiency improvements in aquaculture, and changes in the diets of farmed fish means production has increased rapidly, without increasing inputs from wild fish.