Cuba vs Namibia: Global aquaculture wild fish feed
Cuba
493.08
in 2015
Namibia
278.22
in 2015
Cuba rank
49th
Namibia rank
50th
Global aquaculture wild fish feed over time
- Cuba
- Namibia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 493.08 against 278.22 in Namibia, a difference of 214.86.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.8 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 50th of 69 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,271 | 2.69 | 2,268 | Cuba |
| 1970s | 21,679 | 27.19 | 21,652 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 49,552 | 109.51 | 49,442 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 19,426 | 405.33 | 19,021 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 404.66 | 319.29 | 85.38 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 242.48 | 246.69 | 4.2 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global aquaculture wild fish feed, Cuba or Namibia?
- Cuba, at 493.08 against 278.22 in Namibia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in global aquaculture wild fish feed between Cuba and Namibia?
- 214.86, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Namibia?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2015.
- How do Cuba and Namibia rank globally for global aquaculture wild fish feed?
- Cuba ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 50th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture wild fish feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.