Colombia vs Mauritania: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed

Colombia
8,890 tonnes
in 2015
Mauritania
5,798 tonnes
in 2015
Colombia rank
36th
Mauritania rank
39th

Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed over time

  • Colombia
  • Mauritania
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k195019822015

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 8,890 tonnes against 5,798 tonnes in Mauritania, a difference of 3,092 tonnes.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.5 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Mauritania ahead.

Colombia ranks 36th and Mauritania ranks 39th of 69 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Mauritania Difference Ahead
1950s 2.2 tonnes 75.15 tonnes 72.95 tonnes Mauritania
1960s 18.85 tonnes 228.17 tonnes 209.32 tonnes Mauritania
1970s 2,830 tonnes 455.93 tonnes 2,374 tonnes Colombia
1980s 5,859 tonnes 402.74 tonnes 5,456 tonnes Colombia
1990s 30,973 tonnes 358.21 tonnes 30,614 tonnes Colombia
2000s 27,042 tonnes 1,514 tonnes 25,529 tonnes Colombia
2010s 7,291 tonnes 4,856 tonnes 2,435 tonnes Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed, Colombia or Mauritania?
Colombia, at 8,890 tonnes against 5,798 tonnes in Mauritania as of 2015.
What is the difference in global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed between Colombia and Mauritania?
3,092 tonnes, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mauritania?
66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
How do Colombia and Mauritania rank globally for global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed?
Colombia ranks 36th and Mauritania ranks 39th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Mauritania: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid, drawing on Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/colombia/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/colombia/mauritania/">Colombia vs Mauritania: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed
Unit
tonnes
Source
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
69 places, 4,524 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed

Some wild fish catch is processed into fishmeal and oils for animal feed – this is used for land-based livestock and fish farms (aquaculture). Efficiency improvements in aquaculture, and changes in the diets of farmed fish means production has increased rapidly, without increasing inputs from wild fish.