Colombia vs El Salvador: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed

Colombia
8,890 tonnes
in 2015
El Salvador
7,016 tonnes
in 2015
Colombia rank
36th
El Salvador rank
38th

Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed over time

  • Colombia
  • El Salvador
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k195019822015

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 8,890 tonnes against 7,016 tonnes in El Salvador, a difference of 1,874 tonnes.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was El Salvador ahead.

Colombia ranks 36th and El Salvador ranks 38th of 69 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 6 and El Salvador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia El Salvador Difference Ahead
1950s 2.2 tonnes 1.79 tonnes 0.4101 tonnes Colombia
1960s 18.85 tonnes 4.08 tonnes 14.77 tonnes Colombia
1970s 2,830 tonnes 124.42 tonnes 2,705 tonnes Colombia
1980s 5,859 tonnes 6,678 tonnes 819.42 tonnes El Salvador
1990s 30,973 tonnes 17,021 tonnes 13,952 tonnes Colombia
2000s 27,042 tonnes 7,317 tonnes 19,726 tonnes Colombia
2010s 7,291 tonnes 2,935 tonnes 4,356 tonnes Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed, Colombia or El Salvador?
Colombia, at 8,890 tonnes against 7,016 tonnes in El Salvador as of 2015.
What is the difference in global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed between Colombia and El Salvador?
1,874 tonnes, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and El Salvador?
66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
How do Colombia and El Salvador rank globally for global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed?
Colombia ranks 36th and El Salvador ranks 38th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs El Salvador: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid, drawing on Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/colombia/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/colombia/el-salvador/">Colombia vs El Salvador: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed
Unit
tonnes
Source
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
69 places, 4,524 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed

Some wild fish catch is processed into fishmeal and oils for animal feed – this is used for land-based livestock and fish farms (aquaculture). Efficiency improvements in aquaculture, and changes in the diets of farmed fish means production has increased rapidly, without increasing inputs from wild fish.