Cape Verde vs Georgia: Global aquaculture wild fish feed
Cape Verde
20.63
in 2015
Georgia
70.34
in 2015
Cape Verde rank
59th
Georgia rank
56th
Global aquaculture wild fish feed over time
- Cape Verde
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 70.34 against 20.63 in Cape Verde, a difference of 49.71.
That makes Georgia's figure about 3.4 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Georgia ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 59th and Georgia ranks 56th of 69 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1.68 | 3.78 | 2.1 | Georgia |
| 1960s | 2.85 | 10.05 | 7.2 | Georgia |
| 1970s | 3.06 | 36.69 | 33.62 | Georgia |
| 1980s | 3.16 | 59.16 | 56.01 | Georgia |
| 1990s | 3.63 | 10.66 | 7.03 | Georgia |
| 2000s | 4.99 | 13.57 | 8.58 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 13.91 | 58.4 | 44.49 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global aquaculture wild fish feed, Cape Verde or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 70.34 against 20.63 in Cape Verde as of 2015.
- What is the difference in global aquaculture wild fish feed between Cape Verde and Georgia?
- 49.71, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Georgia?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Cape Verde and Georgia rank globally for global aquaculture wild fish feed?
- Cape Verde ranks 59th and Georgia ranks 56th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture wild fish feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.