Bangladesh vs Uruguay: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed

Bangladesh
2,024 tonnes
in 2015
Uruguay
1,652 tonnes
in 2015
Bangladesh rank
41st
Uruguay rank
43rd

Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Uruguay
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k195019822015

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 2,024 tonnes against 1,652 tonnes in Uruguay, a difference of 372 tonnes.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 41st and Uruguay ranks 43rd of 69 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Uruguay Difference Ahead
1950s 20.09 tonnes 13.9 tonnes 6.19 tonnes Bangladesh
1960s 38.77 tonnes 23.12 tonnes 15.65 tonnes Bangladesh
1970s 56.38 tonnes 166.9 tonnes 110.52 tonnes Uruguay
1980s 105.39 tonnes 3,945 tonnes 3,840 tonnes Uruguay
1990s 878.19 tonnes 1,213 tonnes 335.19 tonnes Uruguay
2000s 2,818 tonnes 3,925 tonnes 1,107 tonnes Uruguay
2010s 2,751 tonnes 1,908 tonnes 842.59 tonnes Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed, Bangladesh or Uruguay?
Bangladesh, at 2,024 tonnes against 1,652 tonnes in Uruguay as of 2015.
What is the difference in global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed between Bangladesh and Uruguay?
372 tonnes, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uruguay?
66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
How do Bangladesh and Uruguay rank globally for global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed?
Bangladesh ranks 41st and Uruguay ranks 43rd of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Uruguay: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed. Statizoid, drawing on Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/bangladesh/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/global-aquaculture-wild-fish-feed/bangladesh/uruguay/">Bangladesh vs Uruguay: Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global aquaculture production and wild fish used for animal feed
Unit
tonnes
Source
Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
69 places, 4,524 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed

Some wild fish catch is processed into fishmeal and oils for animal feed – this is used for land-based livestock and fish farms (aquaculture). Efficiency improvements in aquaculture, and changes in the diets of farmed fish means production has increased rapidly, without increasing inputs from wild fish.