Australia vs Cuba: Global aquaculture wild fish feed
Australia
892.49
in 2015
Cuba
493.08
in 2015
Australia rank
46th
Cuba rank
49th
Global aquaculture wild fish feed over time
- Australia
- Cuba
How they compare
Australia currently reports 892.49 against 493.08 in Cuba, a difference of 399.41.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.8 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Cuba ahead.
Australia ranks 46th and Cuba ranks 49th of 69 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 35.06 | 610.22 | 575.15 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 51.28 | 1,484 | 1,433 | Cuba |
| 1970s | 724.69 | 21,679 | 20,954 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 11,098 | 49,552 | 38,453 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 13,375 | 19,426 | 6,052 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3,451 | 404.66 | 3,046 | Australia |
| 2010s | 438.56 | 242.48 | 196.08 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global aquaculture wild fish feed, Australia or Cuba?
- Australia, at 892.49 against 493.08 in Cuba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in global aquaculture wild fish feed between Australia and Cuba?
- 399.41, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for global aquaculture wild fish feed?
- Australia ranks 46th and Cuba ranks 49th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture wild fish feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.