Argentina vs Namibia: Global aquaculture wild fish feed

Argentina
612.88
in 2015
Namibia
278.22
in 2015
Argentina rank
47th
Namibia rank
50th

Global aquaculture wild fish feed over time

  • Argentina
  • Namibia
05.0k10.0k15.0k195019822015

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 612.88 against 278.22 in Namibia, a difference of 334.66.

That makes Argentina's figure about 2.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 47th and Namibia ranks 50th of 69 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,304 2.69 1,302 Argentina
1970s 819.67 27.19 792.47 Argentina
1980s 661.35 109.51 551.85 Argentina
1990s 2,312 405.33 1,907 Argentina
2000s 846.97 319.29 527.68 Argentina
2010s 760.53 246.69 513.85 Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global aquaculture wild fish feed, Argentina or Namibia?
Argentina, at 612.88 against 278.22 in Namibia as of 2015.
What is the difference in global aquaculture wild fish feed between Argentina and Namibia?
334.66, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2015.
How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for global aquaculture wild fish feed?
Argentina ranks 47th and Namibia ranks 50th of 69 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Global aquaculture wild fish feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Global aquaculture wild fish feed
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
69 places, 4,524 data points, 1950–2015
Last refreshed