Mongolia vs Myanmar: Gender gap in the share of Self-employed people in [industry]
Gender gap in the share of Self-employed people in [industry] over time
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -4.95 % against -8.04 % in Myanmar, a difference of 3.09 %.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 24th and Myanmar ranks 27th of 61 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.1 % | -8.69 % | 17.79 % | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 2.4 % | -8.04 % | 10.44 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of self-employed people in [industry], Mongolia or Myanmar?
- Mongolia, at -4.95 % against -8.04 % in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of self-employed people in [industry] between Mongolia and Myanmar?
- 3.09 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Myanmar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Myanmar rank globally for gender gap in the share of self-employed people in [industry]?
- Mongolia ranks 24th and Myanmar ranks 27th of 61 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of Self-employed people in [industry]: Non-agricultural AFS employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.