Lesotho vs Samoa: Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of
Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of over time
- Lesotho
- Samoa
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 19.43 % against 18.58 % in Samoa, a difference of 0.85 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 2nd and Samoa ranks 3rd of 139 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.77 % | 12.11 % | 18.65 % | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 21.84 % | 22.41 % | 0.57 % | Samoa |
| 2020s | 19.61 % | 21.59 % | 1.98 % | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of, Lesotho or Samoa?
- Lesotho, at 19.43 % against 18.58 % in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of between Lesotho and Samoa?
- 0.85 %, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Samoa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Samoa rank globally for gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of?
- Lesotho ranks 2nd and Samoa ranks 3rd of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of employment in agrifood systems out of total employment by subindustry: Employment in agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.