Botswana vs Panama: Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Agricultural
Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Agricultural over time
- Botswana
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 24.35 % against 18.27 % in Botswana, a difference of 6.08 %.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Panama ahead.
Botswana ranks 8th and Panama ranks 7th of 67 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.89 % | 25.46 % | 2.57 % | Panama |
| 2010s | 25.85 % | 25.1 % | 0.75 % | Botswana |
| 2020s | 21.27 % | 24.7 % | 3.42 % | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: agricultural, Botswana or Panama?
- Panama, at 24.35 % against 18.27 % in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: agricultural between Botswana and Panama?
- 6.08 %, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Panama rank globally for gender gap in the share of employees in [industry]: agricultural?
- Botswana ranks 8th and Panama ranks 7th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the share of Employees in [industry]: Agricultural employment — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.