Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old)

Australia and New Zealand
0.3 %
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
-0.8 %
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
22nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
25th

Gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
-1-0.500.51201520192024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.3 % against -0.8 % in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 1.1 %.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 22nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 119 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 0.04 % -0.38 % 0.42 % Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.72 % -0.64 % 1.36 % Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old), Australia and New Zealand or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.3 % against -0.8 % in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old) between Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.1 %, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 22nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-the-prevalence-of-severe-food-insecurity-15-years-old-and-over-no-breakdown/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-the-prevalence-of-severe-food-insecurity-15-years-old-and-over-no-breakdown/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gender gap in the prevalence of severe food insecurity (15 years old and over) (no breakdown by urbanisation) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 1,561 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.