Peru vs Zimbabwe: Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm
Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm over time
- Peru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -14.12 % against -15.87 % in Peru, a difference of 1.75 %.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -10.15 % | -12.48 % | 2.33 % | Peru |
| 2010s | -18.37 % | -8.22 % | 10.15 % | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | -15.99 % | -17.66 % | 1.67 % | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in off-farm, Peru or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -14.12 % against -15.87 % in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in off-farm between Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 1.75 %, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in off-farm?
- Peru ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.