Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Sweden: Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-8.2 %
in 2023
Sweden
31.45 %
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
24th
Sweden rank
26th

Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Sweden
-10010203040200020112023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 31.45 % against -8.2 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 39.65 %.

That makes Sweden's figure about 3.8 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 26th of 31 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 6.39 % 26.55 % 20.16 % Sweden
2010s 3.06 % 27.67 % 24.61 % Sweden
2020s -1.19 % 32.01 % 33.2 % Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in off-farm, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 31.45 % against -8.2 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in off-farm between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Sweden?
39.65 %, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Sweden?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Sweden rank globally for gender gap in share of employment in industry: employment in off-farm?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 24th and Sweden ranks 26th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Sweden: Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-share-of-employment-in-industry-employment-in-off-farm-agrifood-systems/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/gender-gap-in-share-of-employment-in-industry-employment-in-off-farm-agrifood-systems/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/sweden/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Sweden: Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gender gap in share of employment in industry: Employment in off-farm agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
206 places, 4,710 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.