North Macedonia vs Serbia: Gender gap in formal employment by industry: Agriculture — Value
Gender gap in formal employment by industry: Agriculture — Value over time
- North Macedonia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 33.43 % against 22.77 % in North Macedonia, a difference of 10.66 %.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.5 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 2nd of 39 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.09 % | 28.85 % | 15.76 % | Serbia |
| 2010s | 16.74 % | 33.63 % | 16.88 % | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in formal employment by industry: agriculture — value, North Macedonia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 33.43 % against 22.77 % in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gender gap in formal employment by industry: agriculture — value between North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 10.66 %, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Serbia rank globally for gender gap in formal employment by industry: agriculture — value?
- North Macedonia ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 2nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in formal employment by industry: Agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.