Guatemala vs Namibia: Gender gap in formal employment by industry: Agriculture — Value
Gender gap in formal employment by industry: Agriculture — Value over time
- Guatemala
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 4.06 % against 3.9 % in Guatemala, a difference of 0.16 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 15th and Namibia ranks 14th of 39 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gender gap in formal employment by industry: agriculture — value, Guatemala or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 4.06 % against 3.9 % in Guatemala as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gender gap in formal employment by industry: agriculture — value between Guatemala and Namibia?
- 0.16 %, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for gender gap in formal employment by industry: agriculture — value?
- Guatemala ranks 15th and Namibia ranks 14th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gender gap in formal employment by industry: Agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.