Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Fruits - Excluding Wine — Processing

Chile
2,111 1000 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
6,074 1000 t
in 2023
Chile rank
8th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th

Fruits - Excluding Wine — Processing over time

  • Chile
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k201020162023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 6,074 1000 t against 2,111 1000 t in Chile, a difference of 3,963 1000 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.9 times Chile's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 110 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 2,008 1000 t 4,528 1000 t 2,521 1000 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 2,116 1000 t 6,038 1000 t 3,922 1000 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruits - excluding wine — processing, Chile or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 6,074 1000 t against 2,111 1000 t in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruits - excluding wine — processing between Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
3,963 1000 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for fruits - excluding wine — processing?
Chile ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fruits - Excluding Wine — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Fruits - Excluding Wine — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruits-excluding-wine-processing/chile/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruits-excluding-wine-processing/chile/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Fruits - Excluding Wine — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruits - Excluding Wine — Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
153 places, 2,079 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.