Chile vs Zimbabwe: Fruits and their products — Potassium supply — Value

Chile
216 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Zimbabwe
222 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Chile rank
108th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

Fruits and their products — Potassium supply — Value over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
100200300201020162023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 222 mg/cap/d against 216 mg/cap/d in Chile, a difference of 6 mg/cap/d.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 163 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 266.5 mg/cap/d 89.5 mg/cap/d 177 mg/cap/d Chile
2020s 226.5 mg/cap/d 208 mg/cap/d 18.5 mg/cap/d Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruits and their products — potassium supply — value, Chile or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 222 mg/cap/d against 216 mg/cap/d in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruits and their products — potassium supply — value between Chile and Zimbabwe?
6 mg/cap/d, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for fruits and their products — potassium supply — value?
Chile ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fruits and their products — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: Fruits and their products — Potassium supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruits-and-their-products-potassium-supply-value/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruits-and-their-products-potassium-supply-value/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: Fruits and their products — Potassium supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruits and their products — Potassium supply — Value
Unit
mg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.