How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Zambia?

50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Norway vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Norway

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zambia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Norway rank

128th

Zambia rank

127th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Norway
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Norway	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Norway
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Norway
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Norway
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Norway
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Zambia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Norway
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Norway or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Norway and Zambia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Zambia?: 50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Norway and Zambia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Norway ranks 128th and Zambia ranks 127th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/zambia/">Norway vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.