How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Romania?

36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Caledonia vs Romania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

New Caledonia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Romania

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia rank

81st

Romania rank

80th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

New Caledonia
Romania

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 81st and Romania ranks 80th of 138 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Caledonia	Romania	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Romania
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Romania
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Romania
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Romania
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), New Caledonia or Romania?: Romania, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between New Caledonia and Romania?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Romania?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Romania rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: New Caledonia ranks 81st and Romania ranks 80th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Romania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/romania/">New Caledonia vs Romania: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.