How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Kitts and Nevis?

32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Malta

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Saint Kitts and Nevis

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta rank

124th

Saint Kitts and Nevis rank

125th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Malta
Saint Kitts and Nevis

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 124th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 125th of 138 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Saint Kitts and Nevis	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Malta or Saint Kitts and Nevis?: Malta, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Malta and Saint Kitts and Nevis?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Kitts and Nevis?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Malta and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Malta ranks 124th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 125th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Malta vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.