How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Congo

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Congo rank

23rd

Zimbabwe rank

25th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Congo
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 138 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
1970s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Congo or Zimbabwe?: Congo, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Congo and Zimbabwe?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Congo ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.