How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Australia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Kazakhstan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Australia rank

94th

Kazakhstan rank

95th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Australia
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 94th and Kazakhstan ranks 95th of 138 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Australia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kazakhstan
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kazakhstan
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Australia or Kazakhstan?: Australia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Australia and Kazakhstan?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Australia ranks 94th and Kazakhstan ranks 95th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.