Australia vs Equatorial Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Australia
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
94th
Equatorial Guinea rank
96th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Australia
  • Equatorial Guinea
00000196119922024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Australia ranks 94th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 96th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Australia or Equatorial Guinea?
Australia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Australia and Equatorial Guinea?
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Equatorial Guinea?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Australia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Australia ranks 94th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 96th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Equatorial Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/equatorial-guinea/">Australia vs Equatorial Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,368 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.