Singapore vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Singapore
0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
135th
Zambia rank
136th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Singapore
  • Zambia
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0041 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 136th of 138 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 34.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 USD per square kilometre 34.72 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 39.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0052 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.46 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 11.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0057 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 2.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.06 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0221 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0058 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0164 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.0151 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0082 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0115 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Singapore or Zambia?
Singapore, at 0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.007 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Singapore and Zambia?
0.0041 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Zambia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Singapore ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 136th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/zambia/">Singapore vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.