New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

New Caledonia
1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
90th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 138 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5442 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0828 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4614 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1277 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1823 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1987 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9909 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.2667 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2544 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7881 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3598 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2893 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
New Caledonia, at 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
New Caledonia ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.