Namibia vs Singapore: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Namibia
0.0546 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
132nd
Singapore rank
135th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Namibia
  • Singapore
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0546 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0435 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 4.9 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Namibia ranks 132nd and Singapore ranks 135th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0029 1000 USD per square kilometre 34.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 34.72 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 0.0037 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.46 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.0047 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0068 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3231 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3163 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0232 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0254 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0151 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0249 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0533 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0115 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0418 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Namibia or Singapore?
Namibia, at 0.0546 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Namibia and Singapore?
0.0435 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Singapore rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Namibia ranks 132nd and Singapore ranks 135th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Singapore: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/singapore/">Namibia vs Singapore: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.