Guinea vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Guinea
0.3014 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.2848 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
120th
Norway rank
121st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Guinea
  • Norway
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.3014 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2848 1000 USD per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0166 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Guinea ranks 120th and Norway ranks 121st of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0921 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7158 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6237 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.1017 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.859 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7573 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.1253 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8993 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.1755 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3766 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2011 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.2137 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2959 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0822 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.249 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2719 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.2891 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2635 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 USD per square kilometre Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guinea or Norway?
Guinea, at 0.3014 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2848 1000 USD per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guinea and Norway?
0.0166 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Norway rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Guinea ranks 120th and Norway ranks 121st of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/norway/">Guinea vs Norway: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.