Ecuador vs Thailand: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Ecuador
9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
9.24 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
34th
Thailand rank
35th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Thailand
24681012196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.24 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0.07 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 34th and Thailand ranks 35th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 3.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.804 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 3.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5498 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 3.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.05 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 5.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 7.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 10 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.49 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 8.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 8.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9186 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Ecuador or Thailand?
Ecuador, at 9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.24 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Ecuador and Thailand?
0.07 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Thailand rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Ecuador ranks 34th and Thailand ranks 35th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Thailand: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/thailand/">Ecuador vs Thailand: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.