Denmark vs Equatorial Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Denmark
1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
95th
Equatorial Guinea rank
97th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Denmark
  • Equatorial Guinea
012345196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 95th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 97th of 138 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 4.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2248 1000 USD per square kilometre 4 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 3.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2019 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.68 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 3.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2453 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 2.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6869 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8894 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6017 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.648 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 1.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2442 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Denmark or Equatorial Guinea?
Denmark, at 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Denmark and Equatorial Guinea?
0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Denmark ranks 95th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 97th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Equatorial Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/equatorial-guinea/">Denmark vs Equatorial Guinea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.