Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Congo
0.8161 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
104th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
101st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Congo
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
012345196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8161 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.2039 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 104th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 101st of 138 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 0.569 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.483 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.086 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.6899 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6993 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.7973 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.86 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.8155 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3624 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Congo or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8161 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.2039 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Congo ranks 104th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 101st of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.