Colombia vs Mexico: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Colombia
4.78 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
4.81 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
59th
Mexico rank
58th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Colombia
  • Mexico
012345196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 4.81 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 59th and Mexico ranks 58th of 138 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.984 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5908 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3932 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
1970s 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9628 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3469 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1759 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 2.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5478 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 2.95 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5714 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 3.54 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2271 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 4.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0861 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Colombia or Mexico?
Mexico, at 4.81 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Colombia and Mexico?
0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Mexico rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Colombia ranks 59th and Mexico ranks 58th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Mexico: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/mexico/">Colombia vs Mexico: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.