Chile vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
10.8 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
32nd
Ecuador rank
34th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
24681012196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 10.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Chile ranks 32nd and Ecuador ranks 34th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Ecuador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8152 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5384 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 3.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1313 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 5.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2815 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 7.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.241 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 9.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.66 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 10.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.28 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Ecuador?
Chile, at 10.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Ecuador?
1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 32nd and Ecuador ranks 34th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.