Chad vs Niger: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad
0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
0.0961 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
131st
Niger rank
128th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chad
  • Niger
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.0961 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.026 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.4 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 131st and Niger ranks 128th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Niger in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Niger Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0431 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0393 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.054 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0496 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0615 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0561 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0615 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0548 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0609 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0528 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0081 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0664 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0949 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0285 1000 USD per square kilometre Niger
2020s 0.0698 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0962 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0264 1000 USD per square kilometre Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Niger?
Niger, at 0.0961 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Niger?
0.026 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Niger?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Niger rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chad ranks 131st and Niger ranks 128th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Niger: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/niger/">Chad vs Niger: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.