How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Latvia?

25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Latvia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad

0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

0.0928 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

131st

Latvia rank

129th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Chad
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0928 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0227 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Chad's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 131st and Latvia ranks 129th of 138 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0604 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4854 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.425 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.0609 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4549 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.394 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.0664 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1466 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0802 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.0698 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1295 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0597 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Latvia?: Latvia, at 0.0928 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Latvia?: 0.0227 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Latvia?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Chad and Latvia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Chad ranks 131st and Latvia ranks 129th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Latvia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/latvia/">Chad vs Latvia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.