How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?

25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Eritrea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chad

0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Eritrea

0.0371 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

131st

Eritrea rank

133rd

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Chad
Eritrea

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0371 1000 USD per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 0.033 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.9 times Eritrea's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 131st and Eritrea ranks 133rd of 138 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Eritrea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0604 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0409 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0195 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2000s	0.0609 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0371 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0239 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2010s	0.0664 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0367 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0297 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2020s	0.0698 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0371 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0327 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chad or Eritrea?: Chad, at 0.0701 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0371 1000 USD per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chad and Eritrea?: 0.033 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Chad and Eritrea rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Chad ranks 131st and Eritrea ranks 133rd of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Eritrea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/eritrea/">Chad vs Eritrea: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.