Brazil vs New Caledonia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Brazil
1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
88th
New Caledonia rank
87th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Brazil
  • New Caledonia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Brazil ranks 88th and New Caledonia ranks 87th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4226 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5442 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1216 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.5831 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2731 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.8296 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.36 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2645 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8313 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 1.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4051 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9128 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.281 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1919 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Brazil or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Brazil and New Caledonia?
0 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and New Caledonia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Brazil ranks 88th and New Caledonia ranks 87th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs New Caledonia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/new-caledonia/">Brazil vs New Caledonia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.