Bhutan vs Togo: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Bhutan
0.7398 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
0.5974 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
106th
Togo rank
109th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Togo
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.7398 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5974 1000 USD per square kilometre in Togo, a difference of 0.1424 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Togo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 106th and Togo ranks 109th of 138 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4704 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.235 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2354 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.5965 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3101 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2864 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.9367 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3997 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5369 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3853 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.452 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9179 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5677 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8466 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.7338 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5943 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1395 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bhutan or Togo?
Bhutan, at 0.7398 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5974 1000 USD per square kilometre in Togo as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bhutan and Togo?
0.1424 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Togo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Togo rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Bhutan ranks 106th and Togo ranks 109th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Togo: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/togo/">Bhutan vs Togo: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.