Bangladesh vs Chile: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Bangladesh
11.39 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
10.8 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
29th
Chile rank
32nd

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Chile
24681012196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 11.39 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.59 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 29th and Chile ranks 32nd of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 3.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 3.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3135 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 3.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3594 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 3.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.21 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 5.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.38 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 9.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7671 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 10.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3744 1000 USD per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bangladesh or Chile?
Bangladesh, at 11.39 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bangladesh and Chile?
0.59 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Chile rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Bangladesh ranks 29th and Chile ranks 32nd of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Chile: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/chile/">Bangladesh vs Chile: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.