How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Nepal: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Malta

0.0125 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Nepal

0.0135 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malta rank

110th

Nepal rank

109th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Malta
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0135 1000 USD per person against 0.0125 1000 USD per person in Malta, a difference of 0.001 1000 USD per person.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 110th and Nepal ranks 109th of 138 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0465 1000 USD per person	0.0026 1000 USD per person	0.0438 1000 USD per person	Malta
1970s	0.0487 1000 USD per person	0.0026 1000 USD per person	0.046 1000 USD per person	Malta
1980s	0.0562 1000 USD per person	0.005 1000 USD per person	0.0512 1000 USD per person	Malta
1990s	0.0584 1000 USD per person	0.0119 1000 USD per person	0.0465 1000 USD per person	Malta
2000s	0.0338 1000 USD per person	0.011 1000 USD per person	0.0228 1000 USD per person	Malta
2010s	0.0285 1000 USD per person	0.0168 1000 USD per person	0.0117 1000 USD per person	Malta
2020s	0.0162 1000 USD per person	0.0146 1000 USD per person	0.0016 1000 USD per person	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Malta or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0.0135 1000 USD per person against 0.0125 1000 USD per person in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Malta and Nepal?: 0.001 1000 USD per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malta and Nepal rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Malta ranks 110th and Nepal ranks 109th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Nepal: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malta/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malta/nepal/">Malta vs Nepal: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,825 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.