Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0169 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0162 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
98th
Pakistan rank
101st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Pakistan
0.010.020.030.04196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0169 1000 USD per person against 0.0162 1000 USD per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 98th and Pakistan ranks 101st of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0211 1000 USD per person 0.0128 1000 USD per person 0.0083 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0192 1000 USD per person 0.0142 1000 USD per person 0.005 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0184 1000 USD per person 0.0151 1000 USD per person 0.0033 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0343 1000 USD per person 0.0166 1000 USD per person 0.0176 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0275 1000 USD per person 0.0155 1000 USD per person 0.0121 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0211 1000 USD per person 0.0163 1000 USD per person 0.0048 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0177 1000 USD per person 0.0178 1000 USD per person 0.0001 1000 USD per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Equatorial Guinea or Pakistan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0169 1000 USD per person against 0.0162 1000 USD per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 98th and Pakistan ranks 101st of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,825 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.