How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Italy?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Italy: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Ecuador

0.1331 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Italy

0.1491 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ecuador rank

21st

Italy rank

20th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Ecuador
Italy

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0.1491 1000 USD per person against 0.1331 1000 USD per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.016 1000 USD per person.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 21st and Italy ranks 20th of 138 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.1729 1000 USD per person	0.1746 1000 USD per person	0.0017 1000 USD per person	Italy
1970s	0.1318 1000 USD per person	0.181 1000 USD per person	0.0492 1000 USD per person	Italy
1980s	0.0986 1000 USD per person	0.1806 1000 USD per person	0.0819 1000 USD per person	Italy
1990s	0.1294 1000 USD per person	0.1684 1000 USD per person	0.0389 1000 USD per person	Italy
2000s	0.1357 1000 USD per person	0.1652 1000 USD per person	0.0295 1000 USD per person	Italy
2010s	0.1263 1000 USD per person	0.1512 1000 USD per person	0.025 1000 USD per person	Italy
2020s	0.1197 1000 USD per person	0.1474 1000 USD per person	0.0278 1000 USD per person	Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Ecuador or Italy?: Italy, at 0.1491 1000 USD per person against 0.1331 1000 USD per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Ecuador and Italy?: 0.016 1000 USD per person, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Italy?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Italy rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Ecuador ranks 21st and Italy ranks 20th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Italy: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/italy/">Ecuador vs Italy: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,825 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.