How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

China

0.129 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Rwanda

0.12 1000 USD per person

in 2024

China rank

22nd

Rwanda rank

24th

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

China
Rwanda

How they compare

China currently reports 0.129 1000 USD per person against 0.12 1000 USD per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.009 1000 USD per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

China ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0076 1000 USD per person	0.2535 1000 USD per person	0.246 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
1970s	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.2685 1000 USD per person	0.2616 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
1980s	0.0125 1000 USD per person	0.2607 1000 USD per person	0.2481 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
1990s	0.0336 1000 USD per person	0.2326 1000 USD per person	0.1989 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
2000s	0.0744 1000 USD per person	0.1945 1000 USD per person	0.1202 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
2010s	0.1053 1000 USD per person	0.1384 1000 USD per person	0.0331 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
2020s	0.1236 1000 USD per person	0.1143 1000 USD per person	0.0093 1000 USD per person	China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), China or Rwanda?: China, at 0.129 1000 USD per person against 0.12 1000 USD per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between China and Rwanda?: 0.009 1000 USD per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: China ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,825 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.