How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

China

0.129 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ecuador

0.1331 1000 USD per person

in 2024

China rank

22nd

Ecuador rank

21st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

China
Ecuador

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.1331 1000 USD per person against 0.129 1000 USD per person in China, a difference of 0.0041 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

China ranks 22nd and Ecuador ranks 21st of 138 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0076 1000 USD per person	0.1729 1000 USD per person	0.1653 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1970s	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.1318 1000 USD per person	0.125 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1980s	0.0125 1000 USD per person	0.0986 1000 USD per person	0.0861 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1990s	0.0336 1000 USD per person	0.1294 1000 USD per person	0.0958 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2000s	0.0744 1000 USD per person	0.1357 1000 USD per person	0.0613 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2010s	0.1053 1000 USD per person	0.1263 1000 USD per person	0.021 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2020s	0.1236 1000 USD per person	0.1197 1000 USD per person	0.0039 1000 USD per person	China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), China or Ecuador?: Ecuador, at 0.1331 1000 USD per person against 0.129 1000 USD per person in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between China and Ecuador?: 0.0041 1000 USD per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Ecuador rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: China ranks 22nd and Ecuador ranks 21st of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/china/ecuador/">China vs Ecuador: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 139 places, 7,825 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.