Argentina vs Malaysia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Argentina
8.68 % change on previous year
in 2024
Malaysia
7.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Argentina rank
29th
Malaysia rank
31st

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Argentina
  • Malaysia
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 8.68 % change on previous year against 7.35 % change on previous year in Malaysia, a difference of 1.33 % change on previous year.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.84 % change on previous year 1.63 % change on previous year 1.22 % change on previous year Argentina
1970s 4.04 % change on previous year 2.21 % change on previous year 1.83 % change on previous year Argentina
1980s -0.156 % change on previous year 1.28 % change on previous year 1.43 % change on previous year Malaysia
1990s 0.713 % change on previous year 1.33 % change on previous year 0.6207 % change on previous year Malaysia
2000s 0.4911 % change on previous year -1.13 % change on previous year 1.62 % change on previous year Argentina
2010s 0.8528 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year 0.6081 % change on previous year Malaysia
2020s -0.9387 % change on previous year 3.4 % change on previous year 4.34 % change on previous year Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Argentina or Malaysia?
Argentina, at 8.68 % change on previous year against 7.35 % change on previous year in Malaysia as of 2024.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Argentina and Malaysia?
1.33 % change on previous year, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Malaysia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Argentina ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Malaysia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/argentina/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/argentina/malaysia/">Argentina vs Malaysia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,753 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.