Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Suriname
0.9595 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.9595 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.5505 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7049 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0828 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6222 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.8506 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1277 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7228 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.9121 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1987 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7133 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 1.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2743 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 1.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3563 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8821 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 1.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8704 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9913 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 1.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2836 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.9595 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
0.5505 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Suriname ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.