Oman vs Zambia: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Oman
0.1045 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0576 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
135th
Zambia rank
137th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Oman
  • Zambia
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.1045 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.0576 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0469 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.8 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Oman ahead.

Oman ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 137th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.026 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0304 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0347 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0429 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0082 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.069 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0473 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0217 1000 SLC per square kilometre Oman
1990s 0.085 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0544 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0306 1000 SLC per square kilometre Oman
2000s 0.0573 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0477 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0096 1000 SLC per square kilometre Oman
2010s 0.0801 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0571 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.023 1000 SLC per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0.1033 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0575 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0458 1000 SLC per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Oman or Zambia?
Oman, at 0.1045 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.0576 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Oman and Zambia?
0.0469 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Oman and Zambia rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Oman ranks 135th and Zambia ranks 137th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/oman/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/oman/zambia/">Oman vs Zambia: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.