Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Namibia
0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
127th
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Fruit Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.8291 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 140 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.036 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0828 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0468 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0461 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1277 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0816 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0592 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1987 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1396 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0853 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2743 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.189 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.2632 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3563 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0931 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.5286 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8704 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3419 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.6656 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7308 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.6809 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
0.8291 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for fruit primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Namibia ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,778 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.